Showing posts with label truth. Show all posts
Showing posts with label truth. Show all posts

Monday, 22 September 2025

What Is It to Be Us?


By Keith Tidman

What Is It to Be Us?

Pi departs from its usual prose format to offer a poem that probes the oldest philosophical question of them all: Know Thyself. What makes us, us—what “lights the fire that animates us”? It’s a look at the unique cycle of our experiences as a conscious, complexly intelligent, inquisitive, and contemplative species. Our minds pondering themselves ... and beyond. The account briefly reconnoiters some of what’s key to defining who we are, across dimensions both “mind-boggling and sundry”: experience and empiricism, awareness, reality and truth, illusions (“gossamer ghosts), identity, consciousness, ethics (“what morally ought), free will and determinism, theism, language and logic, knowledge and uncertainty, purpose and meaning, cosmos, curiosity and reflection, and nothingness. As well as widening the aperture on who we are by deliberating on our place in the larger cosmic plateau. Where some people pensively envision a universe “made for us by a designer with palette in hand”; whereas others turn to secular explanations that still satisfy the telltale parameters of non-contingency, necessity, and sufficiency.



Galvanized by the continual onrush of sensory cues from surroundings’ presence,
our empirical awareness of the world wends tentacle-like through the fabric of the mind;
In zealous search of knowable realities we hope will garner life’s welcome reassurance,
yet us not uncommonly hampered by chancing upon a knotty metaphysical bind.

The gauzy filaments of objective truth elude our mind’s guarding praetorian presence,
shrouded ambiguously by our invention of reality's illusory, gossamer ghosts;
All the while we clutch white-knuckled to delusions’ hoped-for objective essence,
grasping for a reality unedited by the mind, but which may prove mythological at most.

We wonder what trustily dwells within and lights the fire that animates us,
perhaps it’s what we ourselves choose as a resolutely self-aware identity;
Or perhaps alternatively a fated version of us we hesitate to discuss above a hush,
rather than the emergent mind as an uncannily separate, ethereally otherworldly entity.

The notion of consciousness eerily estranged from the body is arguably for naught,
a polarity of where the mind resides that’s urged on us by those materialism repels;
Yet society’s dogmas compete to piously press upon us ‘what morally ought,’
to accede to the illusion of unshackled, libertarian free agency that determinism dispels.

This ‘ought,’ clued-up by our foreboding mortality, spurs us to ferret out purpose,
where the ethical intent of humanism’s ideals aim to render our community less savage;
And true humanity defies dystopia’s pounding on the door with callous,
where the point–counterpoint between secularism and theism is vain baggage.

In anthropomorphizing divinities for purposes of iconography and relatability,
we paradoxically deify ourselves, where shared attributes whisper of a oneness;
But such false equivalency denotes our species in hubristic coherence with divinity,
where it’s said entreaties go answered and accountability accedes to forgiveness.

Our identity gets forged on the anvil of natural language and its seminal logic,

hammering into its malleable surface the crux of who we are—what it is to be us ;

The arrow of knowledge bends to best foster understanding and tame the chaotic, 

aware of languages’ power and elasticity in drawing the contours of reality thus.

We search, maturing our nascent understanding of the disquieted universe,
imagining the complexity of existence in ways mind-boggling and sundry;
Where thought experiments throw open the door onto new paradigms diverse,
changing knowledge’s landscape, yet where investigation still tarries hungry.

Some dream of a cosmos granularly made for us, by a designer with palette in hand,
but such destiny, as an alluring siren song, risks sounding of vanity unbound;
Therein lie the limits of knowledge, where the certainty of uncertainty is fanned,
and where ideas eclipse the frontiers of realism and commonsense runs aground.

Meantime, we mine and mold our metaphysics for craved significance,
where consciousness and understanding imbue our species with meaning;
We sit astride the sciences and humanities with self-ascribed radiance,
while humbly reminded of the universe as a nursery spawning stars gleaming.

As progeny of star detritus ejected across lightyears by violent supernovas long ago,
humankind is the cosmos probing itself, at which our species indeed excels;
We wonder how it is that natural laws bestow the human mind a clever tableau,
enabling us to ponder the whys and wherefores that therein will always dwell.

The mind stirs tirelessly with fevered curiosity about what’s true and real,
all the while this inborn, foundational quest at its best won’t let us rest;
Not until our expiry time has run its quizzical course and mourning bells peal,
then the nectar of ‘nothingness,’ as the mind wanes within its erstwhile neuronal nest.

Monday, 19 May 2025

Hog-Tied Truth

Truth coming out of the Well (1898) by E. Debat-Ponsan;

by Andrew Porter


Human affairs are tricky, and perhaps for this reason it is especially important to respect how vital ‘truth’ is in one’s relationship to self and others, in institutions, the presiding thrusts of culture, and any form of leadership. The cord is too commonly cut between what is real and acceptance of it. A society that abandons the inalienable value of truth-telling wrecks a whole host of ripe possibilities. The desire for confirmation bias cannot be the foundation of a democracy.

The current United States’ leadership and its sycophants willfully disregard truth and make falsity king. A propaganda mouthpiece called OAN (the One America News), that purports to be a “news network”, has been selected to be the Voice of America. A political pundit calls the organization “just another font of lies”. The United States is fundamentally divided between those who back veracity and those who are willing to accept lies and the injustice that attends them.

Untruth is like radon to a culture, a slow-acting poison. You can’t run a society or a government on deception and misrepresentation. Unsupportable views on justice, adherence to the Constitution, and principles of right simply erode the integrity of what cannot afford to be eroded. Lives depend on whether ‘truth’ is honored – or annihilated.

The hopeful outlook is that assaults on ‘the rule of law’ and the beauty of truth will be a crucible, forcing clarity and inspiring, in democratic countries, a new determination to back ‘truth’. Once loved and defended, ‘truth’ shines the brighter. Truth is the string in a string telephone; what can we hear if it is not there?

The problem of extensive falsity dogs the world currently. It will never not be surprising that there are a good number who do not particularly care about the ‘truth’ if it gets in the way of their suppositions.

A few years ago, Masha Gessen, the Russian-American journalist and activist, commented on Hannah Arendt’s ideas in an essay entitled: ‘Is Politics Possible in the Absence of Truth?’ concluding: 

“When lies overpower truth, politics dies. When politics dies, our world collapses, and we humans die too—because it is only in the world, among other humans, that we exist”.
Which is why a commitment to the truth ought to seriously be reenergised. The unthinkably awful is not just one viable option among others. 

‘Truth’ has, for a good while, been undermined by moral (as opposed to cultural) relativism. This dismisses or denigrates a single or universal set of moral principles. If one person's truth or ethical take is as good as another’s, something essential is and will be in decline. This may well contribute to a loss of moral vocabulary and a shared set of facts, causing people to be unable to distinguish patent falsehood from accuracy. There may be other factors as well, but moral relativism certainly encourages an animus against ‘central or accepted authority’. This paves the way for the siloing of media choices and people's susceptibility to a demagogue or authoritarian.

The veteran American journalist, Edward Miller points out that: 

“the disciplines of science and the rule of law have the same purpose: to find the truth through the careful, unbiased weighing of evidence.”

Miller wonders whether we will stand firm in the fight for this. Because lies are no basis for governance or for conducting any aspect of life. Lies—if they can be understood as such—cause harm to a whole range of things. They damage personal relationships; they undermine trust in institutions; they make government the opposite of a vehicle for advancing the common good.

The question today is, even if truth wins out in the long run, will we be able to weather anti-truth in the short run?